mouse mab against yap (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Mouse Mab Against Yap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 383 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse mab against yap/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 383 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Inhibitory effects of β-galactoside α2,6-sialyltransferase 1 on the Hippo pathway in breast cancer cells"
Article Title: Inhibitory effects of β-galactoside α2,6-sialyltransferase 1 on the Hippo pathway in breast cancer cells
Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry
doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110266
Figure Legend Snippet: α2,3-sialylation regulates the Hippo pathway through competing with α2,6-sialylation. A, the cell lysates from ST3GAL4-3xFLAG-overexpressing (ST3GAL4-OE) MDA-MB-231 cells were immunoblotted with anti-p-YAP S127, anti-YAP, anti-p-LATS1 T1079, anti-LATS1, anti-FLAG, anti-ST6GAL1, and anti-GAPDH antibodies. B, the cell membrane fractions from Con and ST3GAL4-OE cells were blotted with ConA, RCA-I (recognizing terminal galactose), MAA, and SNA lectins. C, cell lysates from the MDA-MB-231 derivative cell lines as indicated (The ST6GAL1 KO + ST3GAL4 OE stable cell line was established by overexpressing ST3GAL4 in ST6GAL1 KO cells.) were immunoblotted with indicated antibodies as mentioned in ( A ). The relative ratios (phospho-YAP and phospho-LATS1 versus YAP and LATS1) in ( A ) and ( C ) are shown as the mean ± SD ( n = 3 biological replicates, n.s. not statistically significant, p > 0.05, ∗∗∗, p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗, p < 0.0001 are determined by two-tail unpaired t test and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test, respectively). D, the cell membrane fractions from the cells mentioned in ( C ) were blotted with ConA, RCA-I, MAA, and SNA lectins. LATS, large tumor suppressor kinase; SNA, Sambucus nigra ; YAP, yes-associated protein; RCA-I, Ricinus communis agglutinin I; ConA, Concanavalin A; ST6GAL1, β-galactoside α2,6-sialyltransferase 1; MAA, Maackia amurensis agglutinin; Con, control.
Techniques Used: Membrane, Stable Transfection, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Schematic diagram of the proposed molecular mechanism for negative regulation of Hippo signaling via ST6GAL1. Various upstream cell membrane receptors of the Hippo pathway have been identified, including the RTKs ( e.g. , EGFR), GPCRs ( e.g. , LPAR4), and integrins ( e.g. , integrin α5β1). The RTK, GPCR, and integrin signals transduced by growth factors (GFs, e.g. , EGF), extracellular factors ( e.g. , LPA), and the extracellular matrix (ECM, e.g. , FN) can facilitate Hippo pathway effectors ( e.g. , PI3K and FAK) association, which promote LATS1/2-mediated regulation of YAP. In the cells with ST6GAL1 expression ( left ), the cell membrane receptors, such as EGFR, LPAR4, and integrin α5β1, are modified by α2,6-sialylation, which mediate the integrin β1–EGFR/LPAR4 complex formation and in turn facilitate their responses to EGF, LPA, and FN, respectively. These signalings inactivate LATS1/2 kinases or induce the dephosphorylation of YAP, finally leading to hypophosphorylated YAP (p-YAP S127). Hypophosphorylated YAP accumulates in the nucleus, where it can bind to various transcription factors (TFs, e.g. , TEAD family) to enhance the expression of target genes ( e.g. , ANKRD1 , CTGF , and CYR61 ) expression that promote cell adhesion, spreading, proliferation, migration, and metastasis. The Hippo signaling can be inhibited by the verteporfin (VP) inhibitor, which targets YAP-TEAD activity. In the ST6GAL1 deficiency cells ( right ), the N -glycans on cell membrane receptors are without α2,6-sialylation, which exhibit weak integrin β1–EGFR/LPAR4 complex formation and delayed responses to EGF, LPA, and FN stimulation and activate the LATS1/2 kinases and phosphorylate YAP on S127. The phosphorylated YAP (p-YAP S127) is retained in the cytoplasm, inhibiting YAP/TEAD-dependent transcription. The p of the red background represents the activation of related proteins, while gray background represents the inactivation. LATS, large tumor suppressor kinase; YAP, yes-associated protein; ST6GAL1, β-galactoside α2,6-sialyltransferase 1; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; FN, fibronectin; GPCR, G protein–coupled receptor; GT, glycosyltransferase; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; FAK, focal adhesion kinase.
Techniques Used: Membrane, Expressing, Modification, De-Phosphorylation Assay, Migration, Activity Assay, Activation Assay

![Manual cell stretching and compression experiment with Brick Strex S. Epithelial cell monolayers were grown on silicon membranes and subjected to stretching or compression in Brick Strex S device. ( a ) Epithelial stretching experiment, where epithelium was subjected to a 25% strain. ( b ) Representative maximum intensity Z-projection confocal microscopy images showing cells before (relaxed substrate) and after stretching (2 h after stretching). Cell were stained with DAPI to highlight the nuclei (magenta) and immunolabelled against \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\upbeta$$\end{document} β -catenin (green). ( c ) Quantification of the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\upbeta$$\end{document} β -catenin after single stretch of the substrate in comparison to unstretched control samples. ( d ) Lateral compression experiment of the epithelial monolayer. ( e ) Cells were stained with DAPI to highlight the nuclei (magenta) and immunolabelled against <t>YAP1</t> (green). ( f ) Quantification of the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio of YAP1 in response to compression. ( g ) Similar lateral compression experiments as shown in e. The cells were stained with DAPI to highlight the nuclei (magenta) and immunolabeled against \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\upbeta$$\end{document} β -catenin (green). ( h ) blow-up images of the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\upbeta$$\end{document} β -catenin staining shown in g. Scale bars 10 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\upmu$$\end{document} μ m. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using an un-paired Student´s t-test when comparing between cells before and after stretching/compression (****p < 0.0001; **p < 0.05).](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_5989/pmc08445989/pmc08445989__41598_2021_97900_Fig2_HTML.jpg)